Davines MOMO Conditioner vs Olaplex No.0 Intensive Bond Building Treatment
Olaplex No.0 Intensive Bond Building Treatment is the lower-concern pick, scoring 19 points higher on the PlainScore rubric.
Score, factor by factor
Concern50 / 5555 / 55
How much genuine, cited concern the ingredients carry, weighted by how much of each is likely present and whether the product stays on or rinses off. Commonly feared but low-concern ingredients cost nothing.
Transparency12 / 2020 / 20
Whether the full ingredient list, and any fragrance, are actually disclosed. An undisclosed "fragrance/parfum" blend hides its allergens and costs points.
Formulation restraint19 / 2525 / 25
Needless irritant or allergen load for the product type. A clean, purposeful formula scores well without any "free-from" theater.
PlainScore81 / 100100 / 100
The three factors summed: concern out of 55, transparency out of 20, formulation restraint out of 25. Higher is lower concern.
Left column: Davines MOMO Conditioner. Right: Olaplex No.0 Intensive Bond Building Treatment. The bold number wins the factor.
What carries concern in each
Only ingredients with genuine, cited concern or known allergen flags. Commonly feared but low-concern ingredients never count against a score.
Davines MOMO Conditioner
- FragranceWatch if sensitive
- CoumarinWatch if sensitive
- Benzyl AlcoholWatch if sensitive
- Lactic AcidWatch if sensitive
- Alcohol Denat.Watch if sensitive
- Undisclosed “fragrance/parfum” blend: its allergens are hidden.
Olaplex No.0 Intensive Bond Building Treatment
Nothing on this label carries meaningful, evidence-backed concern.
The two labels share 2 ingredients
Scored against the PlainScore method; every flag is evidence-graded and cited on its ingredient page. Cosmetic information for general education, not medical advice.