EltaMD UV Clear Facial Sunscreen Broad-Spectrum SPF 46 vs La Roche-Posay Anthelios Mineral Sunscreen Ultra-Light Fluid SPF 50
Effectively a tie. The scores are too close for the rubric to call a meaningful winner.
Score, factor by factor
Concern52 / 5555 / 55
How much genuine, cited concern the ingredients carry, weighted by how much of each is likely present and whether the product stays on or rinses off. Commonly feared but low-concern ingredients cost nothing.
Transparency20 / 2020 / 20
Whether the full ingredient list, and any fragrance, are actually disclosed. An undisclosed "fragrance/parfum" blend hides its allergens and costs points.
Formulation restraint25 / 2525 / 25
Needless irritant or allergen load for the product type. A clean, purposeful formula scores well without any "free-from" theater.
PlainScore97 / 100100 / 100
The three factors summed: concern out of 55, transparency out of 20, formulation restraint out of 25. Higher is lower concern.
Left column: EltaMD UV Clear Facial Sunscreen Broad-Spectrum SPF 46. Right: La Roche-Posay Anthelios Mineral Sunscreen Ultra-Light Fluid SPF 50. The bold number wins the factor.
What carries concern in each
Only ingredients with genuine, cited concern or known allergen flags. Commonly feared but low-concern ingredients never count against a score.
EltaMD UV Clear Facial Sunscreen Broad-Spectrum SPF 46
Nothing on this label carries meaningful, evidence-backed concern.
La Roche-Posay Anthelios Mineral Sunscreen Ultra-Light Fluid SPF 50
Nothing on this label carries meaningful, evidence-backed concern.
The two labels share 2 ingredients
Scored against the PlainScore method; every flag is evidence-graded and cited on its ingredient page. Cosmetic information for general education, not medical advice.